Rating systems are everywhere in our digital world - from e-commerce product reviews and app stores to movie ratings and restaurant feedback. Behind these familiar star displays lies a straightforward yet powerful mathematical concept: the weighted average. This article explains how average ratings are calculated, interpreted, and used across various platforms.
An average rating is a single value that summarizes multiple individual ratings or scores. In most common rating systems (like 5-star reviews), this average represents the central tendency of all ratings given by users or reviewers. Unlike a simple average where all values have equal importance, rating systems typically use a weighted average where each rating level contributes proportionally to its value.
The standard formula for calculating an average rating is:
Where:
For a typical 5-star rating system, this formula becomes:
Where:
Let's walk through a practical example to illustrate how the average rating is calculated:
Imagine a product with the following ratings:
Step 1: Calculate the weighted sum.
Step 2: Calculate the total number of ratings.
Step 3: Calculate the average rating.
Therefore, the average rating for this product is 4.19 out of 5 stars.
Ratings are often converted to percentiles to provide a different perspective or to standardize across different rating scales. For a 5-star system, the conversion is straightforward:
Using our previous example:
This means the product's rating is at the 83.8th percentile of the possible range.
While 5-star systems are common, many other rating scales exist:
Each system has its own calculation method, but the weighted average concept remains central to most approaches.
Several factors can complicate the interpretation of average ratings:
A product with a 5-star average from 2 ratings is less reliable than a product with a 4.3-star average from 1,000 ratings. Many platforms display both the average rating and the number of ratings to help users assess reliability.
Looking only at the average can hide important patterns. For example, a product with mostly 5-star and 1-star ratings (bimodal distribution) might have the same average as a product with mostly 3-star ratings, but they represent very different user experiences.
People with extremely positive or negative experiences are more likely to leave ratings, potentially skewing averages away from the typical user experience.
In many systems, ratings tend to cluster at the high end of the scale, making distinctions between "good" and "very good" products difficult.
To address some of these challenges, many platforms apply adjustments to raw averages:
A Bayesian average incorporates prior information, typically by adding "phantom" ratings at the mean value. This adjustment helps with small sample sizes:
Where:
Instead of displaying a single average, some systems show a confidence interval to indicate the reliability of the rating:
Where:
Some systems give more weight to recent ratings to better reflect current quality:
Where is a time-decay factor that gives more weight to recent ratings.
Average ratings can be displayed in various ways:
Average ratings have numerous applications across different domains:
Online retailers use ratings to help customers make purchase decisions and to rank products in search results. Many also incorporate ratings into recommendation systems.
Streaming services, app stores, and media sites use ratings to help users discover quality content and to provide feedback to creators.
Ride-sharing, freelance marketplaces, and other peer-to-peer platforms use ratings to establish trust between participants.
Companies analyze ratings and reviews to identify product issues, competitive advantages, and opportunities for improvement.
There's no universal answer, but statistical reliability generally improves with larger sample sizes. Some platforms won't display an average until a minimum number of ratings (often 5-10) have been received.
This is a design choice balancing precision with simplicity. Half-star systems provide more granularity without overwhelming users with too many options.
Most platforms collect both numerical ratings and text reviews. The numerical ratings feed into the average, while the text provides qualitative context that helps explain the reasons behind the ratings.
In basic systems, yes. However, many sophisticated platforms now implement various weighting schemes based on factors like reviewer credibility, review recency, or verified purchase status.
Most platforms employ a combination of automated detection systems and manual reviews to identify and remove suspicious ratings that may artificially inflate or deflate averages.